Bill Moyers Interviews William K. Black
6 Comments
The financial industry brought the economy to its knees, but how did they get away with it? With the nation wondering how to hold the bankers accountable, Bill Moyers sits down with William K. Black, the former senior regulator who cracked down on banks during the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s. Black offers his analysis of what went wrong and his critique of the bailout.
William K. Black tells us their names but not the fact that they were 95% Zionist Jews.
July 7th, 2009 at 10:30 pm
what do Jews have to do with it?
we let them pull the wool over our eyes,
we let them do it again,
we are still letting them do it.
the problem is not who is pulling the wool over our eyes
the problem is we are letting them
it’s not their conspiracy, it’s our ignorance that is the real problem, and the real solution will focus on that
July 9th, 2009 at 12:16 am
If you decide to focus on “how” they are conning us rather than “who” is conning us, you will still end up at the same conclusion. People that choose to focus on the ominous “Illuminati” like David Icke and Jeff Rense, still end up confronting Zionist Jews in the end, and hence end up being labeled antisemitic by the ADL regardless if they focus on the real solution or not. In my opinion, the solutions ARE the problem. Take away the isms and where is the conflict?
July 9th, 2009 at 9:44 am
If you focus on who is doing it rather than how, then how do you stop it?
If you kill all the Zionists (yeah right), the Illuminati remain, if you kill all of them (how would you ever know you were done?), then others could step in to take their place. Humans are like coyotes, you cannot kill them faster than they breed and the faster you kill them the faster they breed. It is like trying to stop drug dealing by locking up the dealers, the only way to stop a black market is to legalize the product that is in demand. Similarly, it would not be so hard to have humans be in control if we did not abdicate such control to the conglomeration of corporate conglomerates. The corps are imaginary beings who have all the political and economic power, more rights than humans, and immortality. What difference does it matter who pulls the strings when most of what humans do is solely motivated bu the accumulation of imaginary representations of imaginary wealth (paper money is not actual weal) for imaginary bodies.
IMAO, the only real solution is a sane culture that deals with real issues and does so for, by, and of, real actual biological entities. Race, for another instance, is not real, it is an imaginary property of humans (85% + of human DNA variation is found in Africans).
We need laws, and systems based on biologic reality and the actual needs of actual earthlings.
Calling someone anti-semetic for protesting a euro-centric culture massacring semites (Arabs are the prototypic Semetic people they speak the prototypic semetic language) with euro-centric weaponry, to replace the local sustainably appropriate ag technique with a euro-centric one, cannot be corrected by the more accurate application of the word anti-semite to define Isreal, because race does not exist.
In short, behavior that is not based in any but an imaginary reality cannot be fixed by ascribing the results to some other imaginary reality. What is needed is for the human imagination to imagine that humans would have humans direct human affairs, and then to make it happen as democratically as possible because any hierarchic power structure will function largely to perpetuate itself, thus propagating new fables to bolster new imaginary realities where human individuals are not capable of collectively deciding their own behavior, which is basically what we have evolved as the result of having mastery over.
We are the species of earthling who probes reality and passes on an understanding to our progeny, we are the species who has evolved a conscious collective behavior of conscious individuals.
Let’s just act like it.
July 9th, 2009 at 10:59 am
Your solution of taking away, neutralizing or legalizing the demands within culture or society are paradoxical. Society is based on the constant demand to bring about a change. This foundation is what strengthens, fortifies and hence perpetuates the society. The “how” you can become something better or different than you currently are in order to be free is the demand. But freedom is just a permanent state of pleasure via maintaining one thing without the other; there is no other destiny for society than that. The societal mechanism of maintaining permanence automatically forms a hierarchical pyramid in which the few at the top propose to merge like corporations into a fascist self-perpetuating system of ultimate freedom and liberation = the New World Order (the ultimate pleasure). So in order to wipe out the demands of permanence or state of conflict in the world, we must remove the society as a whole. But at this point, we as a human race cannot exist without society or permanence since we experience ourselves through time and history. History is essentially made out of the demands of the society: different fields of thought, movements and revolutions which rise up and demand change in order to be free and liberated. Whoever is ideologically responsible for the revolutions will also be financially responsible for them. Whoever is free and liberated is maintaining permanence and control. In short, the “who” and the “how” are one unitary movement and cannot be separated.
July 9th, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Freedom is pain and death as much as it is pleasure and life,
other than that i would guess we fundamentally agree with the exception of ordering control as a putative hierarchy (i believe all hiearchic relations to actually be illusions).
I feel that the system is more important than who is abusing it, but yes, unless you know who, and how, there is little hope to “fix” the system.
Ultimately though it is not within the system our liberation lies, but within one’s own mind and nowhere else.
There is no more effective way to enable “them” than to ignore this simple but supremely important point. Regardless of your spiritual belief system, or lack of one, the great teachers of all traditions, and the most important evidence perceivable by the sane mind, underscore that our liberation lies solely between our own ears.
One’s main concern with the system should be with the degree to which it empowers the individual to realize liberation or obfuscates the issues of freedom and responsibility.
One’s main concerns with conspiracy should be this concern with the system, and one’s personal and collective liberation from, and ability to ameliorate, it’s ramifications.
Cause and effect cannot be separated, but the hierarchic relation you perceive i would argue is an illusion, the individual controls the system, the system controls the conspiracy, just as the mind controls the brain, the brain controls the body, which those who think they have power and control would also like to obfuscate (i believe all control to actually be illusion, but will use it as metaphor for the idea of control for lack of any more meaningful word or phrase).
Allness Is Being; celebrate your part!
July 9th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
I would argue that there is no system for harmony and the act of “fixing” the system is an integral part of all systems or the “heart” of the system.. what makes it tick so to speak. So knowing the “who” and “how” of this conspiracy to maintain permanence and power isn’t going to restore harmony. On the contrary, the knowledge of how we are enslaved only maintains and fortifies the self-perpetuating system, the demand to bring about a change via “fixing” the system which as a result maintains the separation and conflict.
“The more things change, the more they stay the same.” ~ Alphonse KARR, Les Guêpes 1849
“You cannot solve a problem with the same level of consciousness that created the problem” ~ Albert Einstein
I agree that liberation does not lie in the system but if thought or what you call the mind created the system, then i don’t agree that liberation lies in the mind either. Language and thought are dualistic by default; concepts and ideas are born out of separation. We experience “ourselves” by giving these concepts and ideas of separation meaning. The meaning comes from our beliefs which stem from our current value systems and experiences. Our current value systems stem from whatever culture or societal “system” we identify with, know and experience. As a result, the knowledge of any system IS just an extension of the knowledge of man. It is my opinion that none of the great teachers of man were liberated and free. They all taught the notion that self-realization or knowing yourself would end in liberation of the self or enlightenment but that is a fallacy. If that were true, India should be a paradise considering all the theologists and godmen its produced over the centuries. All the so-called “selfless” devotees who sought freedom held no responsibility to anything outside of their model or system of spiritual liberation.
And to comment on your last point, sure the hierarchical relation may be an illusion as is paper money but fiat currency via the federal reserve system can cause some very real starvation in Africa…